<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Factory-Checks on O2O Sourcing | China, Seen from the Ground</title>
    <link>https://o2osourcing.com/tags/factory-checks/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Factory-Checks on O2O Sourcing | China, Seen from the Ground</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://o2osourcing.com/tags/factory-checks/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Factory Checks: Distinguishing a Factory Claim From a Documented Production Control</title>
      <link>https://o2osourcing.com/articles/factory-checks-distinguishing-a-factory-claim-from-a-documented-producti-bdbq69/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://o2osourcing.com/articles/factory-checks-distinguishing-a-factory-claim-from-a-documented-producti-bdbq69/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Executive introduction.&lt;/strong&gt; A factory statement such as “every batch is inspected” may be relevant to pre-sourcing research, but it is not proof that inspection occurs. A procedure offers stronger support because it defines what should happen, yet even a polished procedure does not establish that personnel consistently follow it.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A documented production control connects an applicable requirement to a current procedure, responsible roles, traceable implementation records, results, and action when requirements are not met. The purpose of pre-sourcing research is not to approve the supplier from a document review. It is to identify which claim matters, evaluate the evidence level, and plan a distinct &lt;strong&gt;Factory checks&lt;/strong&gt; task.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Plan a Factory Check Around One Product-Specific Risk</title>
      <link>https://o2osourcing.com/articles/how-to-plan-a-factory-check-around-one-product-specific-risk-5yb67s/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://o2osourcing.com/articles/how-to-plan-a-factory-check-around-one-product-specific-risk-5yb67s/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A useful factory check answers a defined sourcing question. It does not attempt to assess every process, management practice, defect type, or commercial capability at the site. During pre-sourcing research, the task should focus on &lt;strong&gt;one product, one risk, and one sourcing decision&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The intended output is a written task card and practical checklist that a competent checker can execute consistently. Its objective, criteria, evidence, sampling approach, and decision rule must all remain tied to the selected product-specific risk.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Turn a Factory Walkthrough into an Evidence Request List</title>
      <link>https://o2osourcing.com/articles/how-to-turn-a-factory-walkthrough-into-an-evidence-request-list-vws8aq/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://o2osourcing.com/articles/how-to-turn-a-factory-walkthrough-into-an-evidence-request-list-vws8aq/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;executive-introduction&#34;&gt;Executive introduction&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A factory walkthrough should produce more than photographs, general impressions, and verbal assurances. Its practical purpose during pre-sourcing research is to identify relevant manufacturing claims, observe how work is performed, and request records or demonstrations that can support—or fail to support—those claims.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The walkthrough should therefore be planned as a distinct verification task. Before the visit, define the products, processes, requirements, records, and factory claims to examine. During the visit, convert each relevant observation into a specific evidence request. Afterward, maintain a dated log showing what was observed, what was requested, how the evidence was checked, and which questions remain unresolved.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to Audit a Supplier Factory: From Documents to the Production Line</title>
      <link>https://o2osourcing.com/articles/how-to-audit-a-supplier-factory-from-documents-to-the-production-line-yeyd93/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://o2osourcing.com/articles/how-to-audit-a-supplier-factory-from-documents-to-the-production-line-yeyd93/</guid>
      <description>&lt;h2 id=&#34;executive-summary&#34;&gt;Executive summary&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;A factory audit should test whether a supplier can perform the work it claims to perform, at the stated site, with available equipment, qualified personnel, controlled processes, traceable records, and realistic capacity. Treat every capability claim as a hypothesis. Verify it through four evidence channels: controlled documents, interviews, historical records, and direct production-floor observation.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;This is an editorial framework, not a certification audit or legal determination. Its evidence-based approach is informed by &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.iso.org/standard/19011&#34;&gt;ISO 19011:2026&lt;/a&gt;, which provides guidance for management-system auditing. Certificate status should be checked with the issuing body or, for relevant accredited management-system certificates, a service such as &lt;a href=&#34;https://support.iafcertsearch.org/verifiers/getting-started/certificate-verification-guide&#34;&gt;IAF CertSearch&lt;/a&gt;; neither result by itself proves product-specific capability.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
