<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Receiving-Inspection on O2O Sourcing | China Supplier Checks &amp; Sourcing Guides</title>
    <link>https://o2osourcing.com/tags/receiving-inspection/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Receiving-Inspection on O2O Sourcing | China Supplier Checks &amp; Sourcing Guides</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://o2osourcing.com/tags/receiving-inspection/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Alibaba Trade Assurance: Check Before Your Forwarder Signs</title>
      <link>https://o2osourcing.com/guides/forwarder-signoff-delivered-trade-assurance-trap/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 11:45:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://o2osourcing.com/guides/forwarder-signoff-delivered-trade-assurance-trap/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Before your forwarder signs, agree the inspection scope and release authority. A crate receipt can leave contents unverified. It does &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt;, by itself, establish that Trade Assurance has ended or that a claim must fail.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;That distinction matters in &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.reddit.com/r/Alibaba/comments/1wi5tqz/how_the_massive_alibaba_vehicle_scams_actually/&#34;&gt;this r/Alibaba discussion about vehicle orders&lt;/a&gt;. The thread was recorded with 54 comments. The poster describes apparently reassuring listings, supplier badges and willingness to accept Trade Assurance, followed by an alleged substitution inside a heavy crate. Their warning concerns the handover in China, before the buyer sees the contents overseas.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
